VIDEO | Considerations for Creating an Advanced Practice Provider Leadership Structure
Leverage the full potential of your growing APP workforce!
Learn more from our ongoing video series that provides insight into emerging workforce trends.
What is the best way to align your APP workforce with system-wide goals?
Developing a well-defined APP leadership structure can help to ensure that all APPs are integrated into existing initiatives that focus on quality of care, patient outcomes, and operational efficiency.
SullivanCotter’s Hadley Powless explains how health systems can do this more effectively!
Looking for additional insight?
Dive deeper into our APP leadership data!
Round out your APP workforce strategy with insight into four different leadership levels – including compensation, administrative time, common titles, and more.
CASE STUDY | Maximizing Value-Based Reimbursement
Looking to align compensation more effectively with payer contracts and incentives?
Learn how a large not-for-profit health system partnered with SullivanCotter to improve its value-based reimbursement strategy.
Moving forward in a new value-based environment, health care organizations must align clinical compensation with reimbursement programs to maximize payer contracts and incentives.
However, this approach can be difficult to navigate without the data-driven insights and expertise needed to inform strategic compensation design.
Discover how SullivanCotter helped a client to improve its value-based reimbursement strategy by:
- Creating distinct physician compensation plans by specialty grouping
- Aligning incentives with payer contracts to improve patient outcomes and cost efficiencies
- Ensuring regular reporting through the Clinician Nexus platform
- …and more!
View the case study for greater insight into this organization’s challenges, our approach, and the outcomes!
How Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center Developed a More Strategic Approach to Physician Recruitment
Leveraging Data-Driven Insights and Expertise to Enhance Physician Recruitment
THE SITUATION
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center (PVHMC), a 427-bed not-for-profit community hospital in Southern California, faced the challenge of effectively managing its physician recruitment efforts. As a standalone medical center, it was vital for the hospital to maintain a robust physician network while navigating California laws that prevent direct employment of physicians. The hospital also needed to ensure that its recruitment strategies would be data-driven for validation purposes and compliant with regulatory requirements.
Before partnering with SullivanCotter, the hospital relied on physician-to-population rates published by an external vendor to assess physician supply and demand in its market. Leveraging this data was a manual, labor-intensive process, and the information required greater accuracy and in-depth analysis to make informed decisions and validate recruitment needs. A more efficient approach was necessary.
Accessing the right data and analytical tools would enable the hospital to anticipate community needs and plan, justify, and execute its recruitment initiatives more efficiently. The hospital required a sophisticated solution that could help support this strategy and maintain legal compliance throughout each step of the recruitment process.
THE APPROACH
PVHMC turned to SullivanCotter’s Provider Needs Assessment (PNA), an interactive cloud-based application, to address its recruitment challenges and reach its goals. Several hospital leadership team members, including the Vice President of Administration, the Vice President of Ambulatory Services, and the Executive Director of Planning, collaborated with SullivanCotter’s consultants to implement the PNA.
The PNA provided PVHMC with a comprehensive analysis of physician supply and demand in its service area, including detailed data on the composition and practice patterns of the local physician community. This enabled the hospital to validate the need for specific physician specialties and ensure its recruitment efforts aligned with community health needs.
The hospital’s cross-functional team worked with SullivanCotter’s consultants to customize the PNA data and insights to focus on the hospital’s unique market dynamics and strategic priorities. This collaborative approach allowed PVHMC to leverage the expertise of SullivanCotter while ensuring the information gathered was personalized.
“The PNA lifted a significant burden by giving us more precise, data-driven insights into our physician community and their practice patterns. It became essential in ensuring compliance and strategically justifying the recruitment of key specialties, allowing us to make informed decisions that align with our community’s health needs,” said Leigh Cornell, Vice President of Administration, PVHMC.
OUTCOMES
Implementing the PNA has helped PVHMC improve its operational efficiency and overall recruitment strategy in several ways:
- The hospital now has access to data-driven insights that enable it to make informed recruitment decisions while remaining compliant. The PNA allows for more robust assessments of physician supply and demand, helping to validate recruitment initiatives with the leadership team and board of directors.
- The hospital developed a more strategic approach to physician recruitment. It can identify potential gaps in physician coverage and better engage with community physicians to understand their practice plans and expansion opportunities.
- SullivanCotter’s PNA offers a more in-depth analysis of the local physician market. SullivanCotter’s PNA captures the full complexity of physician supply and demand. The hospital can now identify physicians who only practice part-time in the service area or have satellite offices outside the primary service area. This provides a more accurate picture of physician availability and assists in recruitment.
“If I needed to recruit physicians, I would use the tool to indicate if we have justification and to show our leadership and CEO. We would see the list of physicians in our community and determine who we need to learn more about or see if there’s an opportunity before we recruit to understand and engage with that physician. We can see if there’s an opportunity either for them to expand their practice or for them to come to us, or if there are barriers to such,” Cornell added.
LESSONS LEARNED
The PVHMC case study offers several lessons for organizations considering a PNA:
- Dedicate time and resources: Engaging cross-functional stakeholders and ensuring they understand the data’s implications is essential for maximizing its value. This investment enables more informed decision-making and a stronger alignment with organizational goals.
- Customize the data to fit organizational needs: While the PNA provides a strong foundational framework, working closely with SullivanCotter’s consultants to tailor the data to your specific market dynamics is critical. This customization involves identifying relevant service area ZIP codes, securing accurate affiliation and employer data, and actively working with the information to build confidence.
- Shift to proactive decision-making: PVHMC transitioned from a reactive recruitment strategy to a more proactive one by embedding the PNA into its strategic planning process. This shift enabled the hospital to anticipate and address physician shortages and community health needs more effectively rather than reacting to gaps as they occurred.
- Use data to validate recruitment efforts: The PNA’s detailed analysis offers clear, data-driven justification for recruiting specific physician specialties. This helps secure the support of key stakeholders, such as leadership teams and boards of directors, and ensures alignment between recruitment initiatives and the broader organizational strategy.
INFOGRAPHIC | APP Leadership Structures Can Support Retention and Engagement
Advanced practice providers are integral to effective and efficient health care delivery.
Enhancing your APP leadership structures can help to support APP engagement, workforce planning, recruitment and retention, and greater alignment with physician workforce strategies.
SullivanCotter research shows that the presence of an APP leader is associated with 2% less turnover. With the direct cost of turnover estimated to exceed $120,000 per APP, this can have a significant financial impact on an organization. Additionally, many organizations are looking to have greater consistency in APP leadership leveling, compensation, and administrative time – and require access to the right data in order to address this.
Dive deeper into the data with our latest infographic! SullivanCotter’s APP Leadership and Organizational Survey – which contains data from more than 81 organizations on more than 1,250 individual APP leaders – reports on four different leadership level, including clinical-level, management-level, head of advanced practice, and top APP executive. This includes compensation data, common titles, administrative duties and more.
Fair Market Value: Supporting Compliance Within Large and Complex Health Systems
Physician compensation is on the rise due to ongoing labor shortages, evolving workforce expectations, and increased competition for talent.
As this trend continues, maintaining regulatory compliance with fair market value (FMV) and commercial reasonableness standards is critical in a complex and active enforcement environment.
Health care organizations must have the appropriate structures in place to help mitigate financial, resource and reputational risk for potential physician compensation violations related to the Stark Law, the Anti-Kickback Statute and IRS not-for-profit regulations.
Download our latest overview to gain greater insight into the following questions:
- How FMV is enforced?
- Why is FMV compliance important?
- How can we manage FMV as a large and complex health care organization?
- What are some of the key considerations and best practices for supporting compliance?
INFOGRAPHIC | Value-Based Performance Measures
Optimize reimbursement by aligning physician compensation more closely with value-based payer incentives.
Since the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has sought to transform the U.S. health care system from one that incentivizes volume to one that rewards value. This includes a shift from fee-for-service payments to mechanisms that link provider reimbursement to improved quality and reduced costs.
As organizations move forward in a new value-based environment, it is critical to align clinical compensation and reimbursement programs to maximize payer contracts and incentives.
CMS’s goal is to have 100% of traditional Medicare beneficiaries in a care relationship with accountability for quality and total cost of care by 2030.
Where does your organization stand?
Download our infographic to learn more about incorporating value-based performance measures into your design process.
Forbes | Fixing Health Equity and Access: Is Collaboration the Answer?
Fixing Health Equity and Access: Is Collaboration the Answer?
Health systems must be adequately funded, staffed, and designed to support health equity across today’s diverse population populations.
Building and staffing health systems have historically relied on supply-and-demand metrics: determine the health profile of a community and hire the appropriate staff to match the care needs of the population.
But that equation no longer adds up.
The industry is experiencing large gaps in care and patient access admist ongoing labor shortages – all of which are hindering health equity programs.
How can we enact real change?
Recently featured in Forbes, SullivanCotter’s President and CEO, Ted Chien, highlights how tax-exempt health care organizations must band together to:
- Modernize our health care system to secure a stable and high-performing workforce
- Gather comprehensive data to help prioritize initiatives and develop strategies that mutually benefit systems and patients.
- Maintain accountability through setting standard performance measures and benchmarking progress against them
INFOGRAPHIC | APP Unrestricted On-Call Pay
Revisit your call pay program with access to the latest benchmarks!
Establishing a comprehensive call pay approach for advanced practice providers (APPs) can help to support care coverage needs, improve patient access, and maintain effective throughput.
As organizations strive to meet growing patient demand, one premium pay practice that continues to receive attention is on-call pay. Many health systems are revisiting their on-call pay structures to better meet the needs of their patients. Implementing an effective APP on-call pay strategy can incentivize providers and improve access to care, throughput, and care coverage within your organization.
Is your current approach missing the mark?
Develop a more competitive strategy with data-driven insight into hourly coverage rates, top compensation methods, key considerations for adjusting on-call pay, and more.
Download our infographic – which features highlights from SullivanCotter’s 2024 APP Compensation and Productivity Survey – to learn more!
INFOGRAPHIC | 2024 Health Care Staff Compensation Survey
The data is in!
Dive deeper into the latest survey results.
In response to an increasingly competitive marketplace for talent, health care organizations require data-driven insight into compensation and pay practices to effectively recruit, retain, and engage key employees.
quip your health care organization with the latest insight into employee compensation and pay practices! SullivanCotter’s Health Care Staff Compensation Survey includes data from over 2,000 organizations on more than 2 million employees.
Results show that median percent changes in base hourly rates for all employees increase by 2.7%. This varies by region with growth highest in the West (7.5%) and Northeast (5.3%) and lowest in the Southeast (1.9%).
Download our infographic – which features highlights from the latest survey report – to learn more about annual compensation increases, salary increase budgets, salary structure adjustments, and projections as organizations move into 2025.
Looking for more? Purchase the 2024 report for deeper insight!
Press Release | Unprecedented competition for APPs driving increases in compensation
Median total cash compensation for advanced practice providers continues to increase across all specialty categories
October 23, 2024 – CHICAGO – SullivanCotter, the nation’s leading independent consulting firm in the assessment and development of total rewards programs, workforce solutions, and data products for health care and not-for-profits, has released its 2024 Advanced Practice Provider Compensation and Productivity Survey Report.
With the advanced practice provider (APP) workforce in high demand, median total cash compensation (TCC) continues to grow across all specialty categories. The 2024 results show the highest year-over-year increases for Surgical specialties at 6.0%. While Primary Care (5.7%) and Medical specialties (5.5%) follow closely behind, the report indicates more modest growth for Hospital-Based specialties at 3.7%. Base hourly rates for each category have followed a similar and steady growth trajectory.
When looking back even further, the data reflects ongoing competition for APPs in a tight market for talent. From 2021-2024, median TCC for nurse practitioners and physician assistants combined has risen a sizable 17% for Primary Care, 15% for Surgical, and 14% for both Medical and Hospital-Based specialties. TCC has grown even more rapidly for CRNAs and CAAs and has increased by approximately 22% in the past three years.
“For most health systems, the demand for care is at an all-time high while the industry is simultaneously facing labor shortages. The competition for APP talent is unprecedented and is placing upward pressure on compensation as organizations look to bridge the gap between higher patient volumes and limited access to care,” said Zachary Hartsell, APP Workforce Practice Leader, SullivanCotter.
In addition to higher salaries, organizations are also utilizing bonuses to aid in APP recruitment and retention as they move forward in a post-pandemic environment. Since 2022, the prevalence of sign-on bonuses has increased from 74% to 82% while the prevalence of retention bonuses has increased from 44% to 50%. Incentive compensation is evolving as well – especially in Primary Care settings. The 2024 survey reports that 50% of organizations utilize incentive pay for at least some of their APPs, with 74% of these organizations structuring incentives as add-on dollars rather than at-risk compensation.
As in prior years, many health care organizations remain focused on addressing turnover and burnout as an additional way to stabilize their APP workforce. This often includes a re-evaluation of work effort, scheduling burden, and premium pay practices. In 2024, average external (11%) and internal (6%) turnover rates were both down 1% from 2023. “With the direct cost of turnover estimated to exceed $120,000 per person, a reduction in turnover can have a significant financial impact on an organization – especially one with a sizable APP workforce,” added Hartsell.
Additionally, many organizations are looking to have greater consistency in APP leadership leveling, compensation, and administrative time. SullivanCotter reported four levels of APP leader compensation data including clinical-level, management-level, head of advanced practice, and top APP executive. SullivanCotter research has shown that the presence of an APP leader is associated with 2% less turnover and a positive but not statistically significant increase in APP productivity.
SullivanCotter’s 2024 Advanced Practice Provider Compensation and Productivity Survey provides critical benchmarking data on compensation levels and pay practices. As one of the most comprehensive resources of its kind for hospitals and health systems nationwide, the survey includes information from nearly 850 organizations representing more than 134,000 individual APPs and over 4,700 APP leaders.
About SullivanCotter
SullivanCotter partners with health care and other not-for-profit organizations to understand what drives performance and improves outcomes through the development and implementation of integrated workforce strategies. Using our time-tested methodologies and industry-leading research and information, we provide data-driven insights, expertise, and data products to help organizations align business strategy and performance objectives – enabling our clients to deliver on their mission, vision, and values.
For more information on SullivanCotter’s surveys, please visit our website at www.sullivancotter.com, or contact us via email or by phone at 888.739.7039.
Modern Healthcare | Physician Compensation Trends: Housing Assistance, More Bonuses
Featuring data and insights from our 2024 Physician Compensation and Productivity Survey.
Health care organizations are getting creative as physician compensation increases amidst ongoing staffing shortages.
SullivanCotter’s Dave Hesselink recently sat down with Modern Healthcare to discuss how hospitals and health systems are addressing recruitment and retention challenges. Beyond increasing base salary, many are offering sign-on or relocation bonuses as well as focusing on other non-monetary incentives such as reduced workloads, less call burden, remote work options in some settings, and more.
Modern Healthcare dives deep into the data from 10 staffing and consulting firms to outline the top 5 trends in physician compensation:
- Employers continue to offer higher salaries, more bonuses
- But money isn’t everything…
- Physicians shift away from practice ownership as private equity grows
- Challenges in recruiting specialists continue
- Pushback grows against pay scales based on productivity
Press Release | Health Care Executive Pay Increases Reflect Competitive Talent Market
Year-over-year increases in median total cash compensation outpaced growth in base salaries
October 17, 2024 – CHICAGO – SullivanCotter, the nation’s leading independent consulting firm in the assessment and development of total rewards programs, workforce solutions, and data products for health care and not-for-profits, has released the results from its 2024 Health Care Management and Executive Compensation Survey. This includes data from nearly 3,300 organizations representing more than 45,000 incumbent managers and executives – making it one of the industry’s most comprehensive compensation benchmarking resources for this workforce.
Base Salaries
The report details year-over-year changes in median base salaries – including across-the-board, merit, and market adjustments – for health care leaders. This year’s 4.6% increase for all executives is on par with the 4.4% growth seen in 2023. As has been the case for the past several years due to the increasing complexity of operations, organization size, and scope of responsibility, median increases for executives at the system level (5.2%) continue to outpace those for executives at subsidiary hospitals (3.5%).
“The industry is experiencing a critical gap in expertise as operations grow more complex and leaders retire or continue to step away. The pool of qualified executive talent is increasingly limited, and this is placing upward pressure on total compensation – particularly via higher base salaries,” said Bruce Greenblatt, Executive Workforce Practice Leader, SullivanCotter.
Health system positions with median base salary increases of 5.0% or greater tend to be those focusing on business strategy, information technology and security, integration, care delivery excellence and legal/regulatory compliance:
-
- Top Leadership Roles: Chief Executive Officer, Chief Administrative Officer
- Information/Digital Technology and Strategy Roles: Top Information Security Executive, Chief Strategy Officer, Top Population Health Executive, Top Managed Care Executive
- Business/Operating Roles: Top Professional Services Executive, Top Quality Executive (Non-MD)
- Regulatory/Compliance Roles: Top Legal Services Executive, Top Compliance Executive, Top Internal Audit Executive
Despite some improvements in operating margin performance, health systems continue to confront several challenges. Pressures such as ever-increasing labor costs combined with a tight market for talent, high inflation, and threats to cybersecurity are ongoing. The demand for skilled executive talent remains high given the complexity of managing care in the current climate, and the heightened scrutiny and regulatory activity surrounding executive compensation is affecting how compensation committees achieve balance across financial, operational and talent risks.
Incentive Awards
Incentive awards were greater for 2023 performance as compared with 2022, reflecting an overall improvement in the operating environment. As a result, total cash compensation (TCC, equal to base salary + annual incentives) increased at a higher rate than base salaries in 2024. Median TCC for system-level executives increased by 8.3% while their base salaries rose by 5.2%. This trend is the same for subsidiary hospital executives as incentive awards were achieved at or near target levels.
Median annual incentive payouts for 2023 performance were closer to target than those provided for 2022 performance, when they were moderately below target. Given that there were no shifts in annual incentive plan prevalence or award opportunity levels, year-over-year changes in TCC can be attributed to higher levels of performance.
“Although performance is improving year-over-year and payouts approximate target, we still saw about half of organizations change their annual incentive plans for the 2024 fiscal year. This included a refined approach to goal calibration and increased weighting of financial and system-wide performance metrics – highlighting the need to focus on financial sustainability, integration, and refined care delivery models to move forward in a post-COVID environment,” said Tom Pavlik, Managing Principal, SullivanCotter.
Planning for 2025 and Beyond
While cautiously optimistic, each organization is managing circumstances unique to their region, market segment, operating model and current stage of post-pandemic recovery. Health systems and their boards should consider the following as they weigh future actions:
-
- Prepare for a competitive talent market by anticipating the need to provide more robust compensation offers for external recruits and market adjustments to current leaders who are critical and in demand.
- Review and update executive compensation programs to meet evolving needs by differentiating competitive pay positioning based on role criticality, impact, and performance and ensuring peer groups represent the most relevant talent markets (even those outside of health care). For incentive compensation, it’s important to assess these plans in the context of the organization’s near and long-term strategy when setting performance metrics and objectives to ensure ongoing effectiveness.
- Prioritize the talent strategy by defining a clear process for assessing and developing leadership and ensuring that action plans (including compensation adjustments where needed) are in place to retain high-risk executives.
- Optimize the leadership structure and career architecture by evaluating headcount, distribution, span of control, and more to enhance overall efficiency. Refining executive job titles and leveling guidelines enables organizations to align leadership positions with the appropriate rewards structure, performance management programs, and career progression pathways.
About SullivanCotter
SullivanCotter partners with health care and other not-for-profit organizations to understand what drives performance and improves outcomes through the development and implementation of integrated workforce strategies. Using our time-tested methodologies and industry-leading research and information, we provide data-driven insights, expertise, and data products to help organizations align business strategy and performance objectives – enabling our clients to deliver on their mission, vision, and values.
For more information on SullivanCotter’s surveys, please visit our website at www.sullivancotter.com or contact us via email or by phone at 888.739.7039.
Note to media: Additional data and interviews are available on request.
INFOGRAPHIC | 2024 APP Compensation and Productivity Survey
Dive deeper into the latest survey results!
The competition for APP talent is unprecedented and is placing upward pressure on compensation as organizations look to bridge the gap between higher patient volumes and limited access to care.
With the advanced practice provider (APP) workforce in high demand, compensation continues to increase and pay practices are evolving – reflecting ongoing competition in a tight market for talent.
Learn more from the latest results of SullivanCotter’s Advanced Practice Provider Compensation and Productivity Survey, which represents one of the most robust datasets of its kind for hospitals and health systems nationwide. This year’s report includes data from nearly 850 organizations on more than 134,000 individual APPs and 4,700 APP leaders.
Median total cash compensation continues to grow across all major specialty categories. The 2024 results show the highest year-over-year increases for Surgical specialties at 6.0%. While Primary Care (5.7%) and Medical specialties (5.5%) follow closely behind, the report indicates more modest growth for Hospital-Based specialties at 3.7%. Base hourly rates for each category have followed a similar and steady growth trajectory.
Download our infographic – which features highlights from the latest survey report – to learn more about annual changes in compensation, wRVU productivity, incentive compensation and more.
Looking for more? Purchase the 2024 report for deeper insight!
INFOGRAPHIC | 2024 Health Care Management and Executive Compensation Survey
Brand new data and benchmarks!
In 2024, year-over-year changes in total cash compensation have outpaced increases in base salaries.
Health care organizations continue to experience a very dynamic environment. This is impacting executive compensation levels, performance priorities, and talent strategies. Pressures such as ever-increasing labor costs, a tight talent market, high inflation, and cybersecurity threats are ongoing. Paired with a limited pool of qualified executive talent, these obstacles are placing upward pressure on compensation.
SullivanCotter’s 2024 Health Care Management and Executive Compensation Survey includes data from nearly 3,300 organizations on more than 45,000 incumbents. This longstanding resource provides organizations with critical compensation market data, information on key executive workforce practices, and insight into emerging industry trends.
Results show that median total cash compensation for system-level executives increased by 8.3% while base salaries grew by 5.2%. This trend is the same for subsidiary hospital executives and can be attributed to higher levels of incentive plan performance.
Download our infographic – which features highlights from the latest survey report – to learn more about annual changes in compensation, incentive plan provisions, and emerging or in-demand roles!
Looking for more? Purchase the 2024 report for deeper insight!
Press Release | Increases in Physician Compensation Return to Historical Annual Growth Levels
SullivanCotter’s latest survey report highlights how annual changes in physician total cash compensation were largely driven by increases in productivity
October 10, 2024 – CHICAGO – SullivanCotter, the nation’s leading independent consulting firm in the assessment and development of total rewards programs, workforce solutions, and data products for health care and not-for-profits, has released new data and benchmarks from the 2024 Physician Compensation and Productivity Survey.
Although median total cash compensation (TCC) continues to increase year-over-year across all major specialty categories, it has returned to historical average growth of 3.5% following significant increases in 2023. This year, the Adult Medical and Pediatric Surgical specialty categories saw the greatest increases at 4.5% and 4.4% respectively. However, over the last five years encompassing the COVID-19 pandemic and significant changes to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) in 2021 and 2023, primary care physicians have seen significantly larger compensation increases than other specialty categories at 16.5% since 2020. This increase aligns with the intent of the 2021 MPFS changes which significantly increased Medicare reimbursement for office-based Evaluation and Management (E&M) CPT codes.
SullivanCotter’s data represents the largest and most comprehensive physician compensation resource for health systems and hospitals. This year’s report includes data from more than 500 hospitals and health systems on approximately 215,000 physicians across 212 specialties. This reflects a 13% increase in the number of physician records reported in the 2023 survey.
Several market forces continue to influence physician compensation in 2024. Perhaps the most significant and long-lasting trend is changing physician workforce expectations. “The pandemic exacerbated workforce expectations for a more sustainable work life. We see this manifested as reduced or eliminated call expectations, additional paid time off, fewer annual expected work hours, and more interest in compensation plans with a higher proportion of fixed compensation and a lower proportion of compensation at risk,” said Dave Hesselink, Managing Principal, SullivanCotter. The 2024 survey documented decreases in annual expected work hours in Critical Care, Hospital Medicine, and Radiology.
This year’s survey report shows increases in TCC were primarily driven by productivity increases. From 2023 to 2024, reported median work relative value unit (wRVU) productivity for the Adult Medical, Primary Care, and Pediatric Medical specialty categories saw increases of 4-6%. “This is likely due to ongoing recovery from the pandemic in 2023 as well as reported wRVU increases from the remaining organizations adopting the 2021 MPFS changes,” said Hesselink. Increases to the wRVU values associated with hospital-based E&M CPT codes drove reported median wRVU increases in hospital-based specialties such as Hospitalist – Family Medicine (9.1%), Emergency Medicine (8.6%), and Hospitalist – Internal Medicine (8.3%).
Additionally, the 2024 report shows that base salary and wRVU productivity continue to be prevalent compensation plan components in Primary Care, Medical, and Surgical specialty compensation plans. Prevalence for these components ranges from 65-75%, which is consistent with last year’s results. Value-based or quality incentives are used by approximately 50% of organizations with payments averaging 6.8% of TCC for specialists, and 8.6% of TCC for Primary Care.
Although many of the high-level compensation design practices are relatively consistent year-over-year, there is greater variation in the number and type of plans being used. “When it comes to compensation design, the days of a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach for groups of any size or specialty mix are gone. As the market looks to align compensation more closely with how care is delivered, we’re seeing varying approaches for physicians based on the care delivery model. You’ll see significant differences, for instance, in the mix of compensation components and corresponding proportion of overall pay for a coverage-based specialist as opposed to a primary care physician, and even differentiation within primary care based on the patient population being served,” said Mark Ryberg, Physician Workforce Practice Leader, SullivanCotter.
About SullivanCotter
SullivanCotter partners with health care and other not-for-profit organizations to understand what drives performance and improves outcomes through the development and implementation of integrated workforce strategies. Using our time-tested methodologies and industry-leading research and information, we provide data-driven insights, expertise, and data products to help organizations align business strategy and performance objectives – enabling our clients to deliver on their mission, vision, and values.
For more information on SullivanCotter’s surveys, please visit our website at www.sullivancotter.com, or contact us via email or by phone at 888.739.7039.
INFOGRAPHIC | 2024 Physician Compensation and Productivity Survey
The data is in!
How does your organization’s physician pay practices compare to the latest benchmarks?
SullivanCotter’s longstanding Physician Compensation and Productivity Survey represents the largest and most comprehensive physician compensation resource for health systems and hospitals.
The 2024 report includes data from more than 500 hospitals and health systems on approximately 215,000 physicians across 212 specialties – which reflects a 13% increase in the number of physician records reported in the 2023 survey.
Median physician total cash compensation continues to increase year-over-year across all specialty categories.
Download our infographic – which features highlights from the latest survey report – to learn more about annual changes in compensation and wRVU productivity from 2023 – 2024.
Looking for more? Purchase the 2024 report for deeper insight!
Driving Strategic Imperatives Through Executive Long-Term Incentives
Driving Strategic Imperatives Through Executive Long-Term Incentives
Managing a health system is more complex than ever before.
by Saila B. Srinivasan, Principal – SullivanCotter
Due to ongoing financial, operational, and workforce pressures, managing a health system is more complex than ever before. It requires highly skilled executives who can lead through challenges, manage change, and inspire transformation.
Effective leadership and accountability are necessary for an organization’s long-term success — utilizing the right pay practices and policies to reward and retain key talent is critical. Long-term incentive plans (LTIPs) can serve as an important tool to provide rewards for meeting multi-year objectives. According to SullivanCotter’s Executive Compensation Pulse Survey, released in May 2024, approximately half of health systems sponsor an LTIP. LTIPs are more common among larger organizations (revenue greater than $3B) at 64% prevalence compared to smaller organizations (revenue less than $3B) at 33% prevalence.
While short-term incentive plans ensure progress on operational metrics and annual financial outcomes, LTIPs have evolved to focus on key transformational and strategic objectives that promote resiliency and sustainability. Identifying appropriate long-term objectives that drive progress while also supporting the advancement of short-term priorities can be challenging –especially in light of the uncertain and volatile operating environment. Finding the right balance of incentive plan objectives and timelines for achieving these priorities requires thoughtful planning.
As a guide, SullivanCotter has developed the following framework for organizations to approach LTIP goal setting by identifying key objectives and setting performance levels that drive progress.
STEP 1: LTIP GUIDING PRINCIPLES
External market factors and the overall performance landscape are critical in identifying long-term priorities.
These priorities fall into two main categories:
Tactical – Organizations struggling to meet short-term performance objectives may utilize LTIPs with more tactical goals pursued over multiple years to accelerate performance improvement or recover towards historical performance levels.
- Example: Overall Turnover – This metric is often included in annual incentive plans. However, it is better positioned as a long-term objective if an organization continues to see an increase in overall turnover and requires multi-year efforts that include financial investments, operational changes, and talent sourcing and retention initiatives that require a longer runway to implement.
Strategic – Organizations looking to move beyond short-term operational objectives to achieve longer-range strategic priorities may require a defined process to achieve multi-year outcomes goals
- Example: Health Equity – For organizations early in the health equity journey, an initial step may include identifying key population disparities in selected clinical metrics (e.g., colorectal cancer screening) followed by the identification of a goal that ultimately closes the disparities in the identified populations.
The following principles can be applied to identify and prioritize potential LTIP goals:
- Align with strategic plan or ’stubborn‘ operational challenges
- Limit goals for increased focus
- Minimize overlapping goals among incentive plans
- Utilize metrics with the greatest impact and availability of data
- Add process measures as needed
- Consider meaningful line-of-sight for participants
- Motivate the right behaviors
- Be aware of any unintended consequences
These principles allow organizations to identify realistic and meaningful priorities that help to advance longer-term
objectives.
STEP 2: STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT AND GAP ANALYSIS
Organizations that frequently review and assess progress toward objectives outlined in the strategic plan are well-positioned to identify key priorities to include in future LTIPs. Organizations that do not regularly review progress may find it difficult to appropriately align priorities and identify key focus areas.
When identifying LTIP goals, start by reviewing the organization’s strategic plan and mapping the plan’s pillars to the goals included in the past and future performance cycles (if known). This will help to identify any gaps in pillar alignment within the LTIP. Next, be sure to assess the prioritization of each pillar over the length of the LTIP cycle (three years being the most prevalent) and indicate the progress on each of the plan objectives.
The figure below provides an example of a current state assessment. This gap analysis shows progress on strategic objectives and helps prioritize key objectives for future LTIP performance cycles.
FIGURE 1.2: STRATEGIC PLAN ADVANCEMENT
STEP 3: MEASURE SELECTION
When determining LTIP priorities, organizations should consider the balance of metrics across incentive plans and the pillars within the organization’s strategic plan. This approach can help to standardize how progress is measured. In addition, it can help to identify if priorities are too narrow or if they position the organization to make progress within the defined performance cycle time frame.
Metrics can include the following:
Outcomes-Based Measures – Outcomes can be measured by an objective metric that reflects progress towards the goal. When considering outcomes, organizations should understand the performance drivers and whether they have the necessary infrastructure, resources, and ability to focus on these objectives appropriately.
- Example: Improve new patient appointment access for identified specialties based on third next appointment availability within seven days. Achievement of this goal may require additional providers, infrastructure enhancements, and implementation of operational processes.
Transformational/Strategic Measures – These measures often include imperatives for which the organization still needs to develop a tactical plan or is in the early stages of exploration. These may be more appropriately aligned with priorities that require disciplined and longer-term incremental progress. Some of these priorities may require the advancement of process steps in the early years.
- Example: Service Line Integration
Year 1: Identify key operational processes that may need to be integrated
Year 2: Develop an integration plan with key milestones that need to be achieved
Year 3: Achievement of defined milestones
The figure below provides a visualization of how an organization with overlapping LTIP performance cycles can map out LTIP goal priorities across multiple cycles to ensure strategic alignment.
FIGURE 1.3: STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Cycle design also influences measure selection. Given the multiple active measures across performance cycles, overlapping plans may run the risk of diluting focus. However, they can also allow for greater flexibility in goal setting since new priorities are identified more often. This allows the organization to pivot as circumstances change. With different, yet still related, measures, organizations may be more likely to make progress on the overarching objective.
End-to-end plans can include more substantial initiatives since the limited number of goals enables greater leadership focus in a single performance cycle. However, such plans require that leadership have a clear perspective on the critical goals since they are set at the start of the cycle and not revisited until the next cycle begins – typically three years later.
Regardless of the plan design, multi-year foresight into possible LTIP priorities better positions organizations to set goals more closely aligned with system-wide strategy.
STEP 4: GOAL CALIBRATION
The approach to LTIP goal calibration can vary based on the two different goal types:
Outcomes-Based Measures – Historically, LTIPs have largely included objective measures that are based on a specific outcome the health system is targeting to achieve. Organizations often define long-term aspirational
performance levels while considering the resource investments required to achieve the desired progress.
Transformational/Strategic Measures – In recent years, organizations have been using LTIPs as tools to drive accountability for identifying and advancing key transformational and strategic measures. In our experience,
successful LTIPs have a flexible calibration process to recognize that some goals initially require the achievement of milestones. This may include setting up the infrastructure to advance a key strategic measure and then identifying desired target and maximum outcomes measures during the performance cycle. This approach is effective for calibrating highly innovative goals or where the intended outcome may not yet be known.
- Example: Digital Innovation
Year 1: Explore clinical areas where AI technology can be implemented in patient care
Year 2: Implement the AI model(s) in identified care environments and identify relevant outcome metrics (number of patients, dollars saved) via the use of this technology
Year 3: Identify the quantifiable amount saved or number of patients that receive care via the newly implemented technology
Organizations that monitor progress and performance throughout the performance cycle can determine if a shift in focus is required by following a consistent framework for identifying LTIP goal priorities and measurement. Monitoring progress quarterly or bi-annually is more appropriate for LTIP goals, given their multi-year longitudinal focus.
CONCLUSION
Not only are LTIPs an effective way to retain and reward key leadership talent, they also can play a critical role in advancing key strategic objectives that are not captured in the annual performance metrics that support day-to-day operations. LTIPs serve as an important tool to drive performance and system-wide results. Despite current market uncertainty and volatility, using a consistent framework – by applying key guiding principles, assessing strategic alignment, thoughtfully considering measure selection, and calibrating meaningful goals – will help ensure LTIPs focus on meaningful priorities for each performance cycle that will drive long-term success. Using this approach, LTIPs can help the organization focus on transformational efforts that meet the long-range needs of the communities they serve.
Optimizing Clinician Affiliation to Drive Strategy and Performance
Maintain effective relationships and foster greater engagement with clinicians to support long-term health system sustainability.
Rob Moss, Principal, SullivanCotter
Thomas Johnston, JD, Principal, SullivanCotter
Stan Stephen, Principal, SullivanCotter
Originally published by the American Association of Provider Compensation Professionals
The health care industry is no longer in crisis mode. Financial recovery efforts have been underway for the past couple of years, with many health systems stabilizing the core of their enterprises as they entered into 2024. As these improvement efforts continue, organizations should focus on ‘right-sizing’ their service line portfolios to identify underperforming functions, drive select programmatic growth, and diversify revenue streams moving forward.
The clinician workforce is critical to achieving these goals and supporting long-term sustainability.
Maintaining effective relationships and fostering greater engagement can help to ensure clinicians are working in lockstep to amplify strategic service lines and enhance clinical performance. As such, many systems are eager to understand and optimize their investment in clinician affiliation arrangements across their entire physician enterprise.
This includes defining the overall number and type of clinicians needed within the system, understanding the different workforce requirements of both employed non-employed physicians by specialty and location, and instituting programs to help clinicians achieve key system-wide goals.
This article will focus on best practices in driving clinician performance through:
- Supporting strategic workforce alignment of employed and affiliated clinicians
- Selecting the optimal physician-hospital affiliation model within your organization
- Reviewing affiliation arrangements regularly to ensure continued alignment
Supporting Strategic Workforce Alignment
Healthcare systems should assess overall professional service needs in conjunction with the capacity of employed and independent clinicians aligned with core service lines and markets. A comprehensive clinical workforce plan that models the supply and demand – both now and into the future – for physicians and APPs will allow organizations to identify gaps in required coverage and service needs. The objective is to determine how many physicians and APPs are necessary based on geography and the patient population demographics. This assessment will help determine the critical mass of employed and independent clinicians to drive sustainability and select programmatic growth. For example, when a health system is moving into a new market, a workforce plan will help to determine how many clinicians to employ and whether to contract with some physicians to fulfill an unmet need in the community for a particular type of service.
Once gaps in necessary clinical services and coverage are identified, the organization can develop an overall workforce strategy to meet its short- and long-term goals and determine how best to incentivize both employed and affiliated clinicians workforce to meet these objectives.
Designing organizational performance metrics and incentives aligned across the enterprise is critical to achieving and sustaining desired results – and can be managed through incentives written into affiliation arrangements. The enterprise must be interconnected with shared accountability and understanding of how individual and group contributions lead to system-wide success. The addition of unified scorecards creates an opportunity to align performance goals from the leadership level to individual practices and clinicians.
Performance incentives, by nature, are designed to drive the performance of a particular goal – whether quality-related, operational, programmatic, or financial. The objective is to have everyone ‘rowing’ in the same direction. For example, objectives set at the system level should be effectively transferable to the medical group or various service lines and create aligned priorities. Similarly, aligning goals between employed and independent physicians within the same service line is key to promoting efficient care delivery. There must be greater alignment of key performance indicators across both employed and affiliated clinicians to help improve service line delivery and achieve pay-for-performance metrics in payer contracts. As the leadership team and employed physicians have incentives to work toward the same goals, it makes sense for the agreements with independent physicians to do the same.
Selecting the Optimal Physician-Hospital Affiliation Relationship
In order to remain competitive in today’s dynamic environment, health care organizations are seeking to optimize clinical care and enhance performance through a wide range of physician-hospital affiliation relationships and models covering both employed and non-employed physicians. Most health systems rely on a mixture of these models – ranging from low levels of affiliation to full practice integration and employment – which include supportive compensation arrangements and performance requirements aligning with fee-for-service and value-based reimbursements.
There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Organizations should develop a customized approach to managing and strengthening physician relationships based on unique organizational circumstances and affiliation needs. As new partnerships with clinicians are considered, it is important to be intentional in selecting the most appropriate type of arrangement with associated performance metrics and incentives to help drive high levels of performance. Depending on the composition of the system’s existing clinician ecosystem, market forces, competition, and service line objectives, different affiliations might be more effective than others.
Reviewing Affiliation Arrangements to Ensure Continued Alignment
Consistent and structured reviews of clinician affiliation arrangements should be conducted using a standard scoring methodology to support continued alignment with strategic goals and service line performance expectations. This also helps organizations assess if they are getting the services for which they are paying and ensure clinicians are meeting contractual obligations.
Although the criteria used will vary slightly based on type of affiliation arrangement, it is important to evaluate the following requirements:
- Drives service line strategic and financial performance
- Aligns with organizational needs for transition to population health and increased managed care risk-based reimbursement arrangements
- Ensures an adequate number of clinicians to support greater patient access and high quality of care
- Supports timely and effective decision-making on operational and performance-based issues
- Drives intended results through a sustainable financial model
- Enables effective measurement of results and ability to monitor performance across all metrics and incentives.
- Fulfills legal and regulatory requirements such as consistent fair market value (FMV) and commercial reasonableness
- Considers external and strategic market forces such as payer contracts, shifts in community needs, and succession planning
Conclusion
As organizations optimize their portfolios to focus more acutely on improving key service lines and enhancing long-term financial sustainability, it is necessary to ensure that a strong clinical workforce plan with effective affiliation arrangements is at the core of this. This not only includes putting the right clinicians in the right place at the right time, but also effectively engaging them in ongoing performance improvement efforts. A well-considered clinician affiliation strategy – one that is based on the unique goals and circumstances of each organization – will lay the foundation for maintaining effective relationships with both employed and independent physicians, help to align performance metrics and incentive compensation across the enterprise, and support strategic service line delivery and programmatic growth moving forward.
Long-term sustainability requires all hands on deck.
SullivanCotter’s Provider Affiliation and Optimization team partners with organizations to identify, quantify, and optimize physician and advanced practice provider (APP) relationships and performance to improve productivity, engagement, financial results, staffing ratios, and more.
INFOGRAPHIC | Leveling Up: Executive Job Titling
Leveling Up: Strengthen Your Executive Career Architecture with the Right Job Titling Framework
Utilizing SullivanCotter’s Workforce Insights360™
Leading a health system is complex and demanding work – and your executives are only as strong as the structures in place to support them. As the cornerstone of an effective workforce strategy, a comprehensive job architecture lays the foundation for your leadership team to thrive. This includes
clearly defined job titling and leveling frameworks to help drive consistency, communicate accountability, and support recruitment, retention and engagement.
A comprehensive executive career framework allows organizations to:
- Streamline organizational hierarchy and decision-making processes
- Form the basis for a competitive total rewards package with cascading remuneration opportunities
- Support talent retention and career development
Download our infographic to view the latest benchmarks on leadership title by organization side, executive title utilization, and director title utilization.
Looking to dive deeper?
Optimize your workforce with access to data-driven intelligence.
Discover how the size, shape, and cost of your employee population compares to national benchmarks with our Workforce Metrics Benchmark Survey.
Become a data member to unlock exclusive benefits and join a select group of leading health care organizations as they look to stay ahead of the curve in a complex marketplace!
Modern Healthcare | How systems are changing compensation to attract executive talent
Featuring data and insights from SullivanCotter’s 2024 Health Care Management and Executive Compensation Survey
Attracting and retaining executive talent in today’s market is no easy feat.
The industry is experiencing a critical gap in expertise as health care operations grow more complex and the pool of qualified executives – those with the right mix of skills to lead through such challenging times – remains limited. Many organizations are paying higher salaries, reassessing incentives, and investing more in key positions to stay competitive.
Modern Healthcare’s annual deep dive into executive compensation outlines the top five takeaways from this year’s survey findings:
- Rising base salaries reflect ongoing labor challenges
- Systems are realigning incentive packages as performance improves
- Information technology and cybersecurity executives are becoming a necessity
- Organizations are reassessing their structure and redefining leadership roles
- Leaders are going beyond compensation to cultivate internal talent