SullivanCotter’s Article “Life Insurance Versus Traditional Deferred Compensation Designs: 7 Key Questions” Published in Becker’s Hospital Review

Spotlight


SHARE WITH YOUR NETWORK

Life insurance has often been marketed as a tax-efficient way to minimize or avoid the solvency risk and “substantial risk of forfeiture” required by traditional deferred compensation designs in tax-exempt organizations. Split-dollar life insurance was once the answer: What could be better than the employer paying premiums, then getting those premiums back later? For many participants in these plans — and the sponsoring employer — it was too good to be true, with many employers taking large financial losses and participants not receiving the anticipated benefit.

read the full article

 
 
 
   

Related Resources

VIDEO SERIES: Why Traditional Health Care Operating Models Are Falling Short

Organization Design and Workforce Structure

VIDEO SERIES: Why Traditional Health Care Operating Models Are Falling Short
Board Oversight of Executive and Physician Compensation

Board Governance and Effectiveness, Compensation Design and Total Rewards, Physician Compensation Design

Board Oversight of Executive and Physician Compensation
Executive Compensation in Not-For-Profit Health Systems

Board Governance and Effectiveness, Compensation Design and Total Rewards

Article Executive Compensation in Not-For-Profit Health Systems